Current publishing practices make reporting qualitative research
difficult. The lit review-methods-findings model makes most qualitative
projects seem more linear in their execution than they actually were.
Formatting aside, there is often not enough room in traditional
publications to describe in accurate detail the research. Qualitative
projects are often long term and ongoing, and trying to fit adequate
accounts of the process into four pages is basically impossible.
So
qualitative scholars find ways to communicate our processes shorthand.
We cut out much of the context and focus on a few research activities.
We make due. But lack of clarity about the research process has
consequences. Most notably, it becomes challenging to teach qualitative
research because the richer narratives rarely make it into the
articles.
Happily, we live in an era with alternate
ways of disseminating knowledge. The mission of Qualitative Backstage is
simple: to provide an online forum where scholars can share the
backstage stories of their qualitative research projects. We provide
this forum as a resource for researchers and students who aspire to hone
their qualitative expertise.
No comments:
Post a Comment